Senselessly Tooted Disinformation

This host is mostly for my random stuff, and in little part acts like a well-intentioned placeholder for the typosquatted domain.

Discoverability and Archiving

Currently I'm using this host for saving the items from my own feeds to the Wayback Machine and provide in-links for search engines. I hate that I have to do this, but the non-sense ideology of Mastodon pretty much ruined the search feature for Fediverse as a whole, and this wasn't changed by the fact that they owned their mistake and implemented search eventually.

Yes, I (or anyone else) could do similar things with other peoples published feeds, regardless of the tantrum. No, you can't defederate this, because the process doesn't rely on an instance.

Gluttony Section for Search Engines

@pancake Aren't IDA scripts/plugins closely tied to (main) versions?

I'm all for self-explanatory API's, but you should keep in mind that you have a lot of context to build on in case of your own project that others may lack (as a general observation, I'm not familiar with r2's API).

Re: Ghidra I think it usually comes down to a Java vs. The World thing, and once you accept the fundamental paradigms the API is reasonable. I'm curious though about what you find overly "simplified" there?

this post | permalink

@pancake "Gentlemen don't argue about good taste" :) I don't think Ghidra is bad at all (API stability is a good indicator of this IMO), but I have very objective arguments against IDA...

this post | permalink

Apparently on #Fediverse - where safety is so critical that you got burned at the stake when dared to say that searching for things would be actually useful - when I block a user or mute a thread they still show up when my client is not in the mood of hiding them?

#Akkoma

this post | permalink

@pancake But I had a chance to choose the appropriate interface instead of blindly trying things in an environment you can't properly debug...

this post | permalink

[RSS] Hunting CVE-2025-59287 in Memory Dumps

https://medium.com/@Debugger/hunting-cve-2025-59287-in-memory-dumps-b70afd7d2dcf?source=rss-3ba65b326b28------2

this post | permalink

@tshirtman @cs @tmr232 @nieldk You are right and it even seems to be my code dammit! Thanks for your help!

this post | permalink

@tmr232 @nieldk @cs @tshirtman Thanks for the responses, but my diagnosis was wrong - although I still don't quite get it: it turns out that the object I'm writing out (json.dump) contains a list that gets extended by the script (this sort of explains why I'm writing out more and more data), BUT the list is part of an object that I reinstantiate on every run, which should empty the list (I call super() with an empty list). Problem is the (super)class is generated code and I suspect the list is not in fact an object member but a static class variable that may cause this??

this post | permalink

OK so either I have a fundamental misunderstanding of how #Python I/O works, or this is a bug:

I have a `with open(..., "w") as foo:` block in my script. If I execute it twice (now from #IDA, and I experienced the same with #Ghidra) the contents are _appended_ instead of truncating the output first!

WT actual F?!

infosex.exchange <3

You are probably looking for the infosec.exchange Mastodon instance

Discoverability and Archiving

Gluttony Section for Search Engines