infosex.exchange <3

You are probably looking for the infosec.exchange Mastodon instance

This host is mostly for my random stuff, and in little part acts like a well-intentioned placeholder for the typosquatted domain.

Discoverability and Archiving

Currently I'm using this host for saving the items from my own feeds to the Wayback Machine and provide in-links for search engines. I hate that I have to do this, but the non-sense ideology of Mastodon pretty much ruined the search feature for Fediverse as a whole, and this wasn't changed by the fact that they owned their mistake and implemented search eventually.

Yes, I (or anyone else) could do similar things with other peoples published feeds, regardless of the tantrum. No, you can't defederate this, because the process doesn't rely on an instance.

Gluttony Section for Search Engines

What if the human brain can be deceived much cheaper?
this post | permalink
[RSS] Clone2Leak: Your Git Credentials Belong To Us

https://flatt.tech/research/posts/clone2leak-your-git-credentials-belong-to-us/
this post | permalink
@0xabad1dea @Rairii @mathieui @jerry Allow me to link this great presentation by @bcantrill :)

https://youtu.be/-zRN7XLCRhc?si=YvpmuHrq4UZozEpc&t=2044
this post | permalink
In case anyone wanted to play chess on their AS/400:

https://github.com/PoC-dev/gnuchess-as400
this post | permalink
So glad this duo is still active!

Fernanda Martins + Lukas 4decks @ Crow, Madrid, Spain Jan/2025 (VideoSet)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hG79vpFuaXk
this post | permalink
ghidriff - mpengine.dll - VersionTrackingDiff - 1.1.24030.4 vs 1.1.24060.5

https://gist.github.com/v-p-b/f9aa39263e125c8e3b04c4d22fd4d78d#strings

This one executed much faster than SimpleDiff (with the O(n^2) FuncName:Param algorithm)!

Unfortunately the diff is so big it's difficult to judge quality, so the next step is to come up with some metrics that can be checked automatically.

#bindiff #ghidriff
this post | permalink
@gsuberland featuring wat :O
this post | permalink
@tmr232 Valid point, but as I see no further logic for the resolution of such a conflict we can just as well keep the last ("random") result. But let's see what @clearbluejar thinks!
this post | permalink
@joxean @tmr232 Let's hope for that! As I said earlier, I'd be happy to help out, and subscribed to the linked issue.
this post | permalink
@tmr232 @clearbluejar First of all, this is not my code, so there can be hidden assumptions I don't know about.

Functions can have the same name, but 1) as I understand the point here is to create matches based on an exact name and parameter number match 2) we remember symbol objects in the end so string properties shouldn't matter aside of matching.
this post | permalink
Next Page