infosex.exchange <3
You are probably looking for the infosec.exchange Mastodon instance
This host is mostly for my random stuff, and in little part acts like a well-intentioned placeholder for the typosquatted domain.
Discoverability and Archiving
Currently I'm using this host for saving the items from my own feeds to the Wayback Machine and provide in-links for search engines. I hate that I have to do this, but the non-sense ideology of Mastodon pretty much ruined the search feature for Fediverse as a whole, and this wasn't changed by the fact that they owned their mistake and implemented search eventually.
Yes, I (or anyone else) could do similar things with other peoples published feeds, regardless of the tantrum. No, you can't defederate this, because the process doesn't rely on an instance.
Gluttony Section for Search Engines
@womble It can do that (kind of...), and you could e.g. append "succesful" conversations to the initial prompt for adaption. But doing that once on sanitized data vs. continuously on user input are radically different risks.
@GossiTheDog "they stall in enterprise use since they don’t learn from or adapt to workflows" - can't wait for some genius to make user prompts persist in the model so the whole thing can get poisoned!
@TarkabarkaHolgy I've recently recognized a phenomenon that could be called "Dad Brain Syndrome" meaning that you can and will fall asleep given that no immediate family members are around.
Parenting is a hell of a drug!
ECC.fail: Mounting Rowhammer Attacks on DDR4 Servers with ECC Memory
https://ecc.fail/Teachning stones to remember things was a mistake.
@loke @bagder Bug bounty absolutely has perverse incentives, and even I'm not sure if my previous idea can be realistically implemented in this context. It's just an idea and maybe something to ponder on case anyone is facing a similar dilemma.
Next Page