infosex.exchange <3

You are probably looking for the infosec.exchange Mastodon instance

This host is mostly for my random stuff, and in little part acts like a well-intentioned placeholder for the typosquatted domain.

Discoverability and Archiving

Currently I'm using this host for saving the items from my own feeds to the Wayback Machine and provide in-links for search engines. I hate that I have to do this, but the non-sense ideology of Mastodon pretty much ruined the search feature for Fediverse as a whole, and this wasn't changed by the fact that they owned their mistake and implemented search eventually.

Yes, I (or anyone else) could do similar things with other peoples published feeds, regardless of the tantrum. No, you can't defederate this, because the process doesn't rely on an instance.

Gluttony Section for Search Engines

[RSS] Compiling and Running Turbo Pascal in the Browser

https://hackaday.com/2024/04/17/compiling-and-running-turbo-pascal-in-the-browser/
this post | permalink
[RSS] Entra ID Banned Password Lists: password spraying optimizations and defenses

https://www.synacktiv.com/en/publications/entra-id-banned-password-lists-password-spraying-optimizations-and-defenses
this post | permalink
[RSS] Passbolt: a bold use of HaveIBeenPwned

http://blog.quarkslab.com/passbolt-a-bold-use-of-haveibeenpwned.html
this post | permalink
[RSS] Chaining N-days to Compromise All: Part 4 — VMware Workstation Information leakage

https://blog.theori.io/chaining-n-days-to-compromise-all-part-4-vmware-workstation-information-leakage-44476b05d410?source=rss-4b564abdafa3------2
this post | permalink
[RSS] CVE-2024-20697: Windows Libarchive Remote Code Execution Vulnerability

https://www.thezdi.com/blog/2024/4/17/cve-2024-20697-windows-libarchive-remote-code-execution-vulnerability

As expected, this wasn't related to that safe_printf() commit after all...
this post | permalink
@da_667 link plz this sounds pretty amazing
this post | permalink
@stf Thanks for the update! I won't reiterate my previous point about why I think this doesn't make sense from data protection standpoint (but may be a valid case for anti-trust).
this post | permalink
@Nux Exchange is not another mailserver, it has always been a huge monolith in terms of provided services (OWA, IMAP/POP3, calendar, ...), and the exclusion of said features seems like another step against open e-mail, just like the whole O365 strategy.
this post | permalink
Let me get this straight: on-prem Exchange doesn't support DMARC/DKIM, but if you want to send e-mail to O365 users your messages need to be properly demagnezited by The Hawk himself?

https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/answers/questions/1071500/dmarc-and-pkim-for-exchange-2019
this post | permalink
[RSS] This Man Wants to ‘Save the World’ By Letting You Jerk Off Into a Computer

https://www.404media.co/orifice-ai-sex-toy/

A true hero!
this post | permalink
Next Page